Hiring Solutions for Every Team Size
From a two-person startup to a 25-seat enterprise recruiting function — one platform, plan-appropriate limits.
Expertini ATS scales from a small team's first structured hire to an enterprise recruiting org's full-time pipeline, without switching platforms as you grow — the difference between plans is usage limits and tool count, not a different, more limited product.
On this page
01Small teams (Starter)
Unlimited jobs and applications, 25 CMS scores and any 5 Hiring Tools a month — enough to try a real structured hiring process at $11.99/month before stepping up to Pro.
02Growing teams and agencies (Professional)
1,000 CMS scores, any 30 Hiring Tools a month, and Client CRM unlocked — the plan where a recruiting agency working multiple clients, or an in-house team hiring continuously across several open roles, actually fits.
03Enterprise recruiting orgs
10,000 CMS scores, the full 50+ tool suite with early access, 25 team seats, and a dedicated account manager — built for a recruiting function running high volume across many simultaneous searches.
04How to pick a starting plan without overthinking it
Work backwards from one number: how many applicants do you realistically want scored per month? A team making one or two hires a quarter rarely burns through Basic's 25 monthly CMS scores, because in practice you score the plausible subset of a pool, not every application. A team hiring continuously across several roles — or any agency, since Client CRM unlocks at Pro — should start at Pro's 250. Everything that defines the product (unlimited postings, the global distribution, Candidate CRM, the pipeline, deterministic scoring) is identical at every tier, so under-buying costs you a mid-month limit at worst, never a missing capability. Annual billing takes roughly 20% off whichever tier you land on, and the pricing page states every per-plan number side by side.
05What deliberately doesn't change between plans
Some ATS vendors tier the fundamentals — fewer pipeline stages on entry plans, distribution as a paid add-on, scoring quality that improves with spend. We think that model quietly punishes small teams for being small, so the tiering here is usage volume only: the scoring formula, the distribution network, the data protections (PII stripping, org-scoped data isolation), and the core workflow are exactly the same whether you pay $11.99 or $599.99 a month. A two-person startup's candidates get scored by the same published formula as an enterprise's. The full feature list marks the handful of genuinely plan-gated items — all of them tools or seat counts, none of them fairness or safety properties.
Platform architecture & operations
A1How this is architected in the platform
Hiring Solutions for Every Team Size is not a bundle of point products — it is a slice through one platform. The platform is deliberately server-rendered: every view is prepared by the application server and shipped as complete HTML, with no client-side framework, no third-party CDN scripts, and no build pipeline between the data and the page. What renders is what the server computed — the property that makes the interface auditable.
All persistence runs on a single search-native document store; every query carries the organisation's identifier as a mandatory filter at the lowest query layer. Tenant isolation is therefore structural — a property of how every request is composed — rather than a policy that relies on application code remembering to check.
Every capability referenced on this page resolves to a registered tool or connector: the tools directory and the integrations catalogue are renderings of the same registries the application enforces at runtime, so what this page describes and what the product gates can never drift apart.
A2Operational and audit posture
Screening is deterministic and published — the same inputs produce the same outputs, hard requirements block rather than average away, and the methodology is public on the research page. Actions that touch external systems are explicit and journalled per event; usage reporting aggregates the same journals the actions write, not a parallel telemetry system.
Anything that leaves the request path — notification fan-out, webhook delivery, activity journalling, mail — runs in fire-and-forget background threads. A slow external endpoint can never make the interface hang, and a failed side effect is logged rather than silently retried into inconsistency.
Everything written is yours to take: CSV exports and the Data Export app cover the same stores the product itself reads. The exit is as open as the entrance — by design, not concession.
Frequently asked questions
Can I switch plans later without losing data?⌄
Is there a plan for a team that only hires occasionally?⌄
Do bigger plans get better matching or scoring?⌄
At a glance
- Same core product at every tier — limits scale, features don't shrink
- Unlimited jobs/applications from Basic upward
- Client CRM available from Professional for agency use cases
- Dedicated account manager on Enterprise
- Scoring quality and data protections identical on every plan
- Annual billing saves ~20% at every tier
See hiring solutions for every team size on your own hiring.
Bring a real job description to a 30-minute demo — free trial included.
Book a demo