Video Interviews
TOOLS · EXPERTINI ATS

Video Interviews

Async video interviews recorded in the candidate's browser — branded intro, per-answer time limits, inline review and scoring — native to your ATS, no video vendor, no per-minute fees.

3 min read · Updated July 2026 · Expertini Editorial

Every hiring team knows the scheduling gap: after screening comes a week of calendar Tetris just to hear each shortlisted candidate talk for ten minutes. Asynchronous video interviews close that gap — the candidate records answers on their own time, the panel reviews on theirs — but the traditional route means yet another vendor: per-seat licences, per-candidate bundles, another data processor holding your candidates' recordings. Expertini ATS ships async video interviews as a native feature: write up to 8 question prompts, share or send the link, and candidates record browser video answers with no login, no app install, and no third party in the loop.

Every interview opens with your brand, not ours: your logo and tagline, plus an optional intro video — paste a YouTube or Vimeo link (it embeds as a proper player) or a direct video file. Candidates see each prompt, record within the time limit you set (30 seconds to 5 minutes per answer), and can re-record any answer before submitting. Recordings are stored privately on Expertini infrastructure, playable only by your logged-in team — never public, never listable.

REAL SAMPLE ANSWERS — VOICE AND ALL
Candidates record structured answers in their own browser on their own time — no login, no app, no scheduling. Recordings land on the candidate's application, gated to your hiring team only.
Emily J.
Q1 · "Walk us through a project you're proud of" · 0:08
Your rating
Structured signals
Watch the 30-second overview — no sign-up needed
8question prompts maximum per interview
30–300srecording window per answer — you set it
0candidate logins, app installs, or third-party video vendors
0–10per-answer scoring scale, reviewed inline by your team

01How it fills the pipeline gap — a typical flow

Continuing the Python Developer example: eight candidates cleared the technical assessment. Instead of finding eight 30-minute slots across three interviewers' calendars, you create one video interview against the job — the AI can draft the question prompts from the job's real description (1 credit), or you write your own — and invite all eight from the pipeline picker in one click. Within two days, five have recorded. Your panel reviews the recordings inline — each answer has a 0–10 score field and a comment box — whenever they have twenty spare minutes, at 1x or their own pace. The three strongest move to a live final round with the panel already familiar with how each candidate communicates. Days of scheduling compressed into one link.

02Locked to applicants, written back to the pipeline

Like assessments, video interviews only accept candidates whose email matches an application for the linked job — an outsider with the link is asked to apply first. Because every attempt is tied to a real application, your review lands where decisions happen: the total score and reviewer attribution appear on the candidate's application report, in the pipeline, and in the candidate's audit report PDF. "Reviewed by whom, scored what, when" is recorded automatically for every answer — the same activity-attribution discipline the rest of Expertini applies to stage moves, CMS runs, and offers.

03Fair to candidates by design

Async interviews earn a bad reputation when they feel like surveillance. The defaults here lean candidate-friendly: prompts are visible before recording starts, every answer can be re-recorded before submission, the time limit is generous and set by you, and the candidate sees your brand and your questions — not a third-party testing portal. Recordings are shown only to your team, and the invite email tells candidates exactly which address to use, so nobody gets bounced on a technicality.

04What it costs — and what it doesn't

Creating video interviews, inviting candidates, recording, storage, playback, and scoring involve no AI credits at all — the only optional credit spend is AI-drafted question prompts (1 credit). Compare that with standalone video-interview platforms billing per candidate, per interview bundle, or per recruiter seat on top of an ATS subscription: here the entire capability is included from the Growth plan up in one price.

Engineering notes

Platform architecture & operations

A1Architecture: where it sits in the platform

Video Interviews is a first-class module of the Interviewing suite inside the authenticated Expertini ATS workspace. The platform is deliberately server-rendered: every view is prepared by the application server and shipped as complete HTML, with no client-side framework, no third-party CDN scripts, and no build pipeline between the data and the page. What renders is what the server computed — the property that makes the interface auditable.

All persistence runs on a single search-native document store; every query carries the organisation's identifier as a mandatory filter at the lowest query layer. Tenant isolation is therefore structural — a property of how every request is composed — rather than a policy that relies on application code remembering to check.

Availability is governed by the platform's tool registry: this tool is registered from the Growth plan, and access is enforced server-side by the registry gate on every request — never by hiding a button. Plans also carry a monthly distinct-tool quota (3 / 5 / 15 / 30 / 45 across Trial→Business, unlimited on Enterprise), counted at the same chokepoint. The pricing page states both honestly: what is available, and how much of it the month includes.

A2Data model and dependency map

In production the tool reads and writes video-interview definitions (ats_video_interviews), video-interview attempts (ats_video_interview_attempts). Documents are plain, explicitly-mapped fields — mappings are provisioned ahead of first write, so term filters and aggregations behave deterministically instead of depending on inferred types.

Every distinct open is journalled to the tool-activity store — and that journal, not a parallel analytics system, is what the Reports section aggregates. The usage numbers you see are the numbers the platform actually recorded.

Anything that leaves the request path — notification fan-out, webhook delivery, activity journalling, mail — runs in fire-and-forget background threads. A slow external endpoint can never make the interface hang, and a failed side effect is logged rather than silently retried into inconsistency.

A3Operational considerations

Organisation-level settings, destructive actions, and connections are gated to owner and admin roles; recruiters operate the tool on the records they can see. Role changes apply on the next request — enforcement is at the route, not in the menu.

Failures are surfaced, not swallowed: server-side validation returns the exact field and reason, vendor errors are quoted verbatim where integrations are involved, and every write either confirms or reports. Exports regenerate on request rather than being cached — a report you download reflects the store at the moment you asked, not last night's snapshot.

Everything written is yours to take: CSV exports and the Data Export app cover the same stores the product itself reads. The exit is as open as the entrance — by design, not concession.

A4Interaction contract

The interface follows the platform's search-and-select convention: any field that names a real record — a candidate, client, or job — is a type-to-search picker over live data, never a free-typed string, which is what keeps activity trails and deduplication trustworthy. Static choices are filter-as-you-type combos rather than native dropdowns, and state transitions give explicit feedback: server confirmations surface as toasts, validation errors name the exact field, and nothing is shown as done that the server has not confirmed.

The wireframe and flow below document the structural contract of the surface — what panels exist, what order the states occur in, and what happens at every edge — rather than pixels. The layout is composed with native CSS grid and flexbox and adapts from wide desktop to a single column without separate mobile views.

Dependency map

Reads / writesats_video_interviews, ats_video_interview_attempts
Access gateGrowth plan and above — enforced server-side by the tool registry
Monthly quotadistinct tools per month: Trial 3 / Starter 5 / Growth 15 … unlimited on Enterprise
Usage journalats_tool_activity (per open)
Tenancyevery query filtered by organisation id at the query layer
Side effectsbackground threads — never on the request path

Interface blueprint

Structural schematic of the surface — panels, hierarchy, and interaction affordances. A contract, not a screenshot.
Filter bar
combo: statuscombo: rangesearch
action
action
action
action
Fig. 1 — Video Interviews: structural interface schematic. Panels and states are the contract; data shown is placeholder.

Interaction flow — states, validations, feedback

Every state below is enforced server-side; the interface reports it, it doesn't decide it.
Open listregistry gate: plan + monthly quota
Filterserver-side filters; combos over native selects
Act on a rowrecords picked, never re-typed
Server writevalidated + journalled
Feedbacktoast confirms; the row reflects the stored state
Validation failure → the field and reason, inlineConcurrent change → the list re-reads the store; no phantom rowsPlan below minimum → lock page shows the exact tier ladder
Fig. 2 — interaction flow: navy = states, gold = server-enforced gates, green = confirmed outcomes; tags list the edge cases and their feedback.

Frequently asked questions

Do candidates need to install anything or create an account?
No — recording happens in the browser (desktop or mobile) via a single link. Candidates enter their name and the email they applied with; that's the entire setup.
Can anyone with the link record an interview?
No. The interview only accepts candidates whose email matches an application for the linked job — everyone else is asked to apply first. That lock is what lets reviews land on the real application in your pipeline.
Where are recordings stored and who can see them?
On Expertini's private media storage, served only to logged-in members of your organisation. Recordings are never public, never listable, and never shared with any third-party video service.
Does it use AI credits?
Recording, storage, and scoring use none. The only optional credit spend is AI-suggested question prompts, drafted from the job's real description, at 1 credit.
Can I use my company intro video?
Yes — paste a YouTube or Vimeo link (embedded as a proper player) or a direct video file URL, and it plays before question one, after your logo and tagline.

At a glance

  • Browser recording — no candidate login, no app, no video vendor
  • Branded intro: your logo, tagline, and optional YouTube/Vimeo intro video
  • Locked to applicants; reviews land on the application and audit report
  • Invite shortlisted candidates by email from the pipeline picker
  • Per-answer 0–10 scoring with reviewer attribution
  • Included from the Growth plan — no per-candidate or per-minute fees

See video interviews on your own hiring.

Bring a real job description to a 30-minute demo — free trial included.

Book a demo
Expertini AI
Online now
Hi! I'm Expertini's AI Product Expert. Ask me anything about our solutions, get guidance on any of our Hiring Tools, or just tell me what you're trying to do — I'll point you in the right direction. For account-specific issues, email support@expertini.com.